Electronic Portfolio Assessment Rubric
| Skill | Target/Goal | Some Evidence | Little/No Evidence |
| Creative Use
of Technology
|
Innovative use of graphics, sound, e-mail, additional software, Internet resources, multi-media; superior presentation. | Some use of interesting sounds and graphics; links used predictable presentation. | No evidence of independent resources; monotonous presentation. |
| Content Choice | Content is well covered (products relate to the standards). Demonstrates clear understandings and applies what has been learned. Substantantial progress is shown throughout the development of the content. A variety of additional artifacts have been included. | Content is covered and includes general information but lacks descriptive detail. Few additional artifacts have been included. Progress is shown throughout the development of the content. | There is missing evidence or information. No additional artifacts have been included. Demonstrates only surface understanding. |
| Organization and Mechanics
|
Well organized with a variety of products. Maximum and obvious choice in navigation. Navigation is seamless. | Material is organized with many products. Appropriate and clear use of navigation | Minimal or no use of choice in navigation. Material is not clearly organized. |
| Personal Reflection
|
Excellent evaluation of personal strengths and weaknesses, along with evaluation of professional and personal growth through the process. Evidence of a lifelong learning tool and goals are set for future learning. | Evaluation of personal strengths and weaknesses are seen along with evaluation of professional and personal growth through the process. | Evaluation is not clear or thorough of personal strengths and weaknesses, nor professional growth is documented. There is minimal or no evidence of a lifelong learning tools and goals are set for future learning. |
| Effectiveness of Communication
|
Student has demonstrated an excellent holistic understanding of the program goals, through clearly, concisely and coherently presenting ideas. | Student clearly, concisely and coherently presents ideas. Students demonstrates a holistic understanding of program goals. | Student is unable to present ideas in a clear, concise and coherent fashion. Student lacks demonstration of holistic understanding of program goals. |